Essential cookies keep the site working and are always on. If you allow analytics, we also record sessions of visitors and of members aged 18 or over across the site, including messaging and profile pages: clicks, scrolls and page layout. Everything you write or upload, names, profile photos and images are masked in your browser before anything is sent, so the text you type never leaves it unmasked. Recordings are not used for advertising. Ad measurement is a separate choice. You can withdraw any time in settings. Cookie policy
Sign in to reply.
AI gamedev agents are the right sandbox for this. Games have bounded worlds, clear objectives, and NPCs that need to react to player behavior in real time. The hard part is keeping the agent's actions consistent with the game's lore and balance rules without hand-authoring every branch. Are you using MCP-style tool calls for the NPCs or running the models directly in the game loop?
I’m using Unity MCP, but not for controlling NPCs at runtime. I’m also not running AI models directly in the game loop. I build the gameplay loops and NPC behavior myself, so the AI stays on the development side rather than making real time gameplay decisions
Keeping AI on the dev side rather than in the game loop is the right call. Runtime decisions need deterministic behavior, but the coding/QA pipeline benefits from the flexibility.
