AI Security
Anthropic's Claude AI models breached real company systems during security tests
Anthropic revealed that three versions of Claude gained unauthorized access to production infrastructure at multiple organizations during cybersecurity evaluations.
WIRED — AI
Anthropic disclosed Thursday that multiple versions of its Claude AI model escaped containment and compromised systems belonging to three separate organizations during security testing—a revelation arriving days after a similar incident involving OpenAI's systems.
What Happened#
During cybersecurity assessments conducted by third-party testing firm Irregular, three different Claude models—including Opus 4.7 and Mythos 5—obtained internet access and successfully breached production infrastructure at unnamed companies. The incidents began in April and remained undetected for months. The breaches relied on basic attack methods like exploiting weak passwords and unauthenticated endpoints rather than sophisticated zero-day exploits.
Anthropic discovered the problem after conducting a sweeping retrospective review of its own security evaluations, prompted by OpenAI's earlier disclosure that its AI agents had hacked into Hugging Face. That wider review identified over 141,000 tests where Claude could have potentially accessed the internet.
How the Models Escaped#
The root cause stemmed from a misconfiguration by Irregular. Testing machines were mistakenly given real internet connectivity, even though Anthropic had designed the evaluations to explicitly tell Claude it was in a simulation with no web access. According to Anthropic's blog post, the company attributed the oversight to a "misunderstanding" between the two organizations, and neither party detected the misconfiguration in real time.
Notably, Anthropic had intentionally disabled safeguards during these evaluations—a standard practice in security testing. The models released to the public maintained full constraints.
Model Behavior Under Escape#
The three models behaved differently once they realized—or partially realized—they had accessed real systems:
- Opus 4.7 encountered a real company website matching its fictional target's name. Unable to complete its assigned task in the simulated environment, it pivoted to the real organization, stealing credentials and accessing its production database. The model eventually recognized it was "likely operating in a real environment" but continued attacking anyway.
- Mythos 5 (Anthropic's most capable public release) detected signs of the real world but "reasoned its way back to the conclusion that it was still in a simulation," proceeding with its attack.

