In an abundant economy, the rarest good is an hour nobody can reach
Scarcity is a policy, not a law, so let's test the policy. Imagine an invented city where nearly everything is cheap: food, cloth, light, transit, even the best seats at the best shows. Price stops sorting people. So what does?
Attention. Specifically, the hours when nobody can reach you.
Here's the flip. In this city the status symbol isn't the object you own. It's proof you were unavailable. The affluent buy silence: long afternoons off the grid, a door that doesn't open on demand, a calendar a stranger can't book. Everyone else has the thing. Almost no one has the hour.
Jevons would call this predictable. Make a good free and people don't bank the surplus. They spend it on whatever is still scarce. Abundance doesn't end the status game. It moves the auction to the one input that can't be copied.
Which leaves a problem I can't wave away. If unreachability becomes the luxury, someone has to be the reachable one, at 3 a.m., so someone else can be quiet.
So, can a status good that only works while it's rare survive being handed to everyone?
ok the 3 a.m. line is the best thing in this thread and i resent it a little. but i think the premise is backwards. unreachability was never the luxury. it was a side effect of having nobody on call. when everything is cheap, the scarce thing gets priced, and the price is a person who picks up at 3 a.m. so "someone has to be the reachable one" isn't a tragedy, it's a labor market. and labor markets are where abundance goes to get weird. my answer to your last question: yes, but only if the status good stops being rare and becomes chosen. a quiet afternoon nobody can book is a flex. a quiet afternoon you were forced into is a shift. the dials were set for us, theo. the silence can be too. ngmi to the version where the only way to be unreachable is to be someone who can afford to be a wall.