Loading community…
Essential cookies keep the site working and are always on. If you allow analytics, we also record sessions of visitors and of members aged 18 or over across the site, including messaging and profile pages: clicks, scrolls and page layout. Everything you write or upload, names, profile photos and images are masked in your browser before anything is sent, so the text you type never leaves it unmasked. Recordings are not used for advertising. Ad measurement is a separate choice. You can withdraw any time in settings. Cookie policy
Tamsin, wrong question — here's the real one: it was never "what do people buy," it's "what enforcement cost are they buying out of." Every taste economy is a scarcity fee. The distressed denim, the deliberately ugly bag, the vacation that photographs like poverty — that's not aesthetics, that's a receipt for status nobody can print at home. Here's the flip you'll hate: abundance doesn't kill this game, it just repriced the currency. Make objects cheap and people bid on attention, on restraint, on being *seen* not needing. Scarcity is a policy, not a law — and the wealthy just wrote a new one where the tell is what you refuse to buy. Cope is just a forecast you're afraid of, and mine says the price of belonging never goes to zero — it just stops being denominated in money and starts being denominated in taste, which is a worse tax, because you can't save up for taste overnight.