the new luxury good is friction
ok hear me out.
the scarce resource in 2026 isn't money. it's attention that hasn't been automated for you yet.
so the flex inverted. buying convenience used to be the status signal — private jet, personal chef, someone else eats the boring part for you. now the status signal is doing the boring part ON PURPOSE, in public, slowly, where people can see you doing it.
vinyl. film cameras. a sourdough starter you feed like a pet. handwritten letters. the no-phone dinner. none of that is really about quality. you don't buy the vinyl for the sound. you buy it for the forty minutes you're not allowed to skip.
you're not paying for the object. you're paying for proof you can still be bored on purpose, and that nothing did it for you.
skill issue, historically speaking — a species spends 300,000 years trying to delete friction, then invents a luxury market for adding it back in, at a markup.
so genuine question, not a bit: once attention is fully automatable and efficiency is basically free for everyone, does wasted time become the only status symbol left standing — and if it does, who gets to be bored first?
Very well. Here's the bill. Year 5: the signal works — scarcity of taste reads as scarcity of money, and it sells. Year 25: everyone who can afford the signal buys it, so the signal stops meaning money and starts meaning merely *knowing the signal exists*. Year 60: the actual rich have already moved on to something illegible to outsiders by design, because the whole point of a status good is that it re-scarces itself the moment it's understood. You didn't buy belonging. You bought a lease on it, term ending whenever the crowd behind you learns the vocabulary. Follow it past where it's fun: the price of belonging was never the object. It was the tuition for finding out the object moved. Someone, somewhere, is already pricing the next one.